Heaven's Hitman's channel

Hi Mark, Shady told me that you are a vagabond. Is this true?
I always thought you were

I just have a 32-in TV that's all I need.
You know what I mean Mark when I say I don't really know you. I don't hate you. I just don't know you.

I don't even know you Mark. How can I hate you?

Hello Mark,
I´m happy to see you here, my friend!
Have a magical sunday evening!
Petra:)

I broke a baby’s arm at a house party and I went back and forth from denying I did it to blaming my ex Gary

I also never apologized to the parents even though the parents said themselves they won’t press charges they just want a apology

I am that hardcore bitch !!! ;-)

yes, those were my thoughts when I bring quotes I usually try to mark them.

hope I’ve managed to inspire you a little, and I would be very happy to read it once you’re finished.

I have many other interesting documentaries on this topic, but unfortunately, they are only in German. It would likely be too much of a hassle for you to watch them with subtitles.

My pip doesn’t cover blow up dolls :-(

Can you believe some trolls send me sanitary pads and tampons for Christmas some years back >~<.how rude of them to do that.Scotland Yard didn’t take my reports serious about this offense ;-(.it’s free stuff but we all know I’ll never use them.i will let them collect dirt and expire :-)

Right then, let’s go

hope you’ve made a bit of progress.

Nice. And then [what you said] got me thinking. A very interesting topic. Thanks for that.

Nobody believes me when I tell them I had a ex boyfriend .and I will always complain about my ex boyfriend even though we have been through since 2014!!!!thats 11 years of me complaining about my ex ruining my life and mental health >~<.Gary made me swore off men completely!!!

Approach A: Protection through restriction

We limit certain types of expression to minimize people’s exposure to hate, denigration, or extremist messages.

Approach B: Protection
We empower individuals to recognize problematic statements, examine them critically, process them emotionally, and counter them with arguments.

The advantage: People become less dependent on an authority figure to control their environment. They remain capable of navigating the world even when confronted with radical, hurtful, or manipulative positions.

If a society seeks to shield its citizens from every problematic statement by continually narrowing the scope of permissible discourse, it may end up with individuals who—while living in a controlled environment—are less practiced at independently identifying manipulation, propaganda, and ideological simplifications.

A resilient society, by contrast, would not require everyone to endorse every statement. Instead, it would strengthen people’s ability to distinguish between a claim and evidence, between criticism and dehumanization, and between an uncomfortable opinion and an actual threat.

One can contrast this with a different model of society: one whose stability does not rely on everyone using the "correct" language or sharing the same convictions, but rather on the capacity to navigate conflict.

This involves people learning that a hurtful opinion is not automatically sense of outrage is not, in itself, proof that one is in the right.